#Intel g45 g43 express chipset benchmark code#
#Intel g45 g43 express chipset benchmark Pc#

The situation also explains why the team had to make some compromises.Īlthough it was a serious reworking of the Pentium M, the Conroe architecture still sometimes betrayed its mobile roots. Given those conditions-with the tight schedule they had to stick to and the pressure they were under-the results that the Intel engineers achieved are remarkable. It was a challenging task for the team, which now bore Intel’s future on its shoulders.

The team of engineers in Haifa, Israel that, up until then had had responsibility for mobile architectures, was suddenly responsible for providing a design that’d power the entire new line of Intel processors. When Intel realized its Pentium 4 was a dead-end, it had to reinvent an architecture in a hurry-something that’s far from easy for a company the size of Intel. Admittedly, the conditions under which it was developed weren’t ideal. The Conroe architecture offered first-rate performance and very reasonable power consumption, but it was far from perfect. That new architecture is the subject of this article.

#Intel g45 g43 express chipset benchmark code#

Then a whole new architecture was set to arrive 24 months later, with the code name Nehalem. The first phase of the plan was the release of a “refresh” of the architecture 12 months after its introduction, to take advantage of progress in fabrication processes. At that time, Intel announced an ambitious plan to return to evolving its processor architectures at a rapid pace, as they had done in the mid-1990s. With this move, the company won back the performance crown after losing a bit of favor in the debacle that was its Pentium 4 'Prescott' design.

Two years ago, Intel pulled off a coup with the introduction of its Conroe architecture, which surfaced as the Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad.

#Intel g45 g43 express chipset benchmark Pc#

Both are reasonable platforms for our high-efficiency PC project.

We decided to look at two motherboards using Intel’s G31 chipset: Foxconn’s G31MG-S and Gigabyte’s GA-EG31MF-S2. We’re also arming this setup with 4 GB of RAM and a nimble 7,200 RPM hard drive. Unlike the E8000-series, the E7200 has only 3 MB rather than 6 MB L2 cache. We went with a mainstream Core 2 Duo E7200processor manufactured using 45 nm technology, which runs on a 1,066 MHz FSB with a 2.53 GHz core speed. Once you accept the fact that powerful graphics, high-end components, and numerous disk drives cannot be part of an efficient low-power computer, you can choose the right foundation for your machine. Luckily, there is always the option of upgrading to a discrete graphics card down the road should it be something you’re missing. In the case of our test systems, this meant we bid farewell to gaming in order to stay with the integrated graphics unit. While a high power requirement is not an issue as long as you get something in return, components in idle mode don’t provide any benefit, so we demand minimum idle power during times of low or no activity. Despite recent optimizations in Nvidia’s lineup, for instance, most high-end cards still don’t offer sufficient power saving options, resulting in idle power requirements of graphics cards that match or even exceed the power requirements of an entire entry-level PC. Upper mainstream and high-end graphics cards are typically some of the most power-hungry, as most are optimized for 3D features and performance- often at the cost of high power consumption. Once this decision has been made, you can go ahead and select your components according to your efficiency goals. First of all, it is necessary to avoid hardware that increases idle power without doing anything important-this includes all add-on cards and drives that you may not really need, as well as most high -end or enthusiast products, and discrete graphics cards in particular. When you want to create a truly efficient computer, you must bid farewell to some of the components that you may have once taken for granted. We’ re taking a look at two motherboards, which their vendors Foxconn and Gigabyte aim at power-conscious customers, and pairing them to one of the most affordable mainstream processors on the market: Intel’s Core 2 Duo E7200.Įfficient Computing Requires Reasonable Components There are processors and chipsets on the market that will allow you to run a decent desktop system at a very low idle power level, while providing amped-up CPU performance when it’s needed. Combining minimal power requirements with decent desktop performance seemed to be a nearly insurmountable task for many years, but it now seems to be possible.